The Peace Corps on the list: “US foreign aid expected to be biggest casualty of Trump’s first budget”


From The Guardian

Monday — 27 February 2017

US spending on overseas aid is expected to bear the brunt of dramatic cuts as part of Donald Trump’s plan to increase defence spending by $54bn in his upcoming budget.

The US operates the largest and most expansive overseas aid programme in the world, with a proposed federal spend of $50.1bn (£40.3bn) for 2017 alone (pdf). More than $18bn of that is made up of economic and development assistance, commonly referred to as humanitarian aid. A further $8.1bn was due to go towards security assistance.

While humanitarians had been bracing themselves for possible cuts to their budgets since Trump’s election, the indications coming out of Washington on Monday appeared to suggest that he was going to make good on a campaign pledge to “stop sending foreign aid to countries that hate us”.

White House budget officials briefed on Monday said there would be a large reduction in foreign aid, and that most domestic agencies will have to absorb cuts.

The largest single intended recipient of economic and development assistance for this year is Afghanistan ($1bn), followed by Jordan ($632.4m) and Ethiopia ($512.6m).

Alarm bells are also likely to be ringing at the UN, where officials were already on alert after reports that a draft order would usher in 40% cuts to US voluntary contributions to international bodies. US legislators have long complained that the US contribution, at 22% of the main UN budget and nearly 29% of peacekeeping operation costs, is disproportionate.

Question marks are also likely to now hover over the US stance on providing resources to urgent humanitarian emergencies. The US had been expected to make up the bulk of further efforts to answer an appeal by humanitarian bodies and the UN for $1.5bn needed this year to prevent a famine Africa’s stricken Lake Chad region. It is currently a third of the way to completion following pledges at a conference on Oslo by European governments and some others.

“We are really very concerned about assistance to sub-Saharan Africa bearing the brunt of these cuts,” said Tom Hart, North America executive director at the aid advocacy group the One campaign.

“But I think at this point we are concerned also that, frankly, the whole portfolio is coming under extreme stress. It’s ironic and upsetting given that our own military leaders have been saying that aid is a crucial part of our national security infrastructure.”

More than 120 retired US generals and admirals urged the US Congress on Monday to ensure that foreign aid spending would be protected, warning: “We know from our service in uniform that many of the crises our nation faces do not have military solutions alone.

 “The State Department, USAid, Millennium Challenge Corporation, Peace Corps and other development agencies are critical to preventing conflict and reducing the need to put our men and women in uniform in harm’s way,” they added.

The letter, organised by the US Global Leadership Coalition, which advocates for robust aid spending was signed by some of the most prominent US military officers to serve in recent decades, including retired Gen George Casey, former chief of staff of the US army; and retired Gen David Petraeus, the former CIA director and commander of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

News of the impending cuts are likely to come as a shock at the US Agency for International Development (USAid), where senior officials had privately been briefing that they were optimistic, citing a recent visit to their office by the new US secretary of state, Rex Tillerson.

While the US has the world’s largest development aid budget, it is actually one of the least generous countries in relative terms: its foreign aid spending for 2015 stood at just 0.17% of gross national income, compared with Britain’s 0.7%.

The US public appears to be largely unaware of this, with research from YouGov suggesting that just over half of those polled think the US gives too much away in terms of foreign aid.



Leave a comment
  • Two points: The Peace Corps is still the cheapest form of two-way information outreach. Second, investment in the Lake Chad is smart spending in a most strategic spot. Think hub of world’s most accessible frontier market. Plenty of duplicative make-work federal bloat programs out there. The Peace Corps ain’t one of them.

  • Don’t they understand that for each dollar spent we reap the benefits of better health, clean water, good will that supports us against radical influences? Is it buying influence? Well, perhaps but better us than some others.

  • A PEACE CORPS MEMORY Looking back, and I have told my story before, about 1960 as an intern at WGBH-TV meeting JFK twice, once seeking the Democratic Party nomination and the second time AS the nominee, both when he was the guest on Louis Lyons’ (Nieman Journalism Foundation Curator, Harvard) news program on which I was the assistant. On one, I think the first, Lyons spoke about Hubert Humphreys’ idea (of what would be called the Peace Corps, then unnamed as something similar to the American Friends Service Committee program abroad). The then Senator John Kennedy replied in his best almost happy/ smart manner that it was a good idea (saying good ideas from another candidate were GOOD ideas) and that “When I am president, I will start such a program” (or words pretty close to that, and ending with his handsome head cocked to the side and smiling — you know like the cat that ate the cream). I was 23 then and it thrilled me, not just the idea for beginning such an organization but as much for the joyful intelligence and daring-do in a politician. As a Peace Corps Volunteer heading later that very day on a prop, 2 engine airplane to Ghana in late August 1961 in the White House, I met PRESIDENT Kennedy both in the Rose Garden and in the Oval Office along with the other volunteers from early Peace Corps groups –Columbia, Tanganyika, Ghana. There were 50 of us in Ghana One.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Copyright © 2022. Peace Corps Worldwide.