For a week straight I’d been sneaking into NYU’s Bobst Library on an expired one day pass. My mission? A haphazard, undirected and fairly aimless study of my upcoming Philippines Peace Corps service.
I spent a day reading Kathleen Nadeau’s History of the Philippines. Another I devoted entirely to the year 1961: I would flip between Making Them Like Us: Peace Corps Volunteers in the 1960s and the ‘61 entries in Filipino Short Stories in English, 1956-1972. I can’t say why. On the subway I read Tuttle’s Basic Tagalog for Foreigners and Non-Tagalogs. That at least was practical.
But my high stakes game of library crashing would catch up with me. The security guards would wise up, I would be found out, my expired pass would be confiscated, and I would leave Bobst with head hung low in scholarly shame.
No matter. During that week, the truth is I had no idea what I was looking for, and by the end of it, only a vaguely better idea of what I was getting into.
Then again, put it in perspective: as a Peace Corps volunteer in the 21st century, my unknowns were comparatively few. When on March 4, 1961 President Kennedy tasked his brother-in-law Sargent Shriver with Executive Order 10924, making him “responsible for the training and service abroad of men and women of the United States in new programs of assistance to nations and areas of the world,” Shriver was staring up the hill of one helluva steep learning curve.
Likewise with the volunteers: my correspondence with volunteers Sylvia Boecker (1961-63) and Nick Royal (1962-64) reminded me to cherish internet research and modern libraries. Sheila writes, “I knew that the Philippines had been part of the Spanish Empire. I think that is all I knew when I was accepted into Peace Corps.” And Nick: “I was offered a post in the Philippines—had to look that country up on the map! I thought, ‘Well, the Spanish were in the P.I. for 400 years, so Spanish must be spoken there.’ False assumption, but off I went to the Philippines.”
In Making Them Like Us, I read all about early Peace Corps. The first training programs featured lessons in boat building, spear fishing, coconut husking, weaving palm fronds and climbing coconut trees (40). Each day, volunteers did 140 jumping jacks, 120 sit-ups, 120 touching toes, 30 push-ups, and 100 jumps in place; in the pool five laps of crawl, three laps of breast stroke, and two of side stroke (41). Language acquisition was not emphasized. [Author's note: after publication of this, some early volunteers commented that this was not their experience.]

[Peace Corps Volunteers, 1961]
In contrast, my twelve weeks’ training in the summer of 2010 would involve four hours daily of language study, practicum training sessions in the local schools, extensive teaching pedagogy, and zero jumping jacks.
Scholar Fritz Fisher said the early training reflected contemporary fascination with the western pioneer mythos. The volunteers reflected it, too. One of the members of the 1961 group to Manila said “the new frontier of the Philippines is like our wild west. There it is Indians; here it is head hunters.” Another called the country “still quite primitive, but it is also a pioneer country in the process of change.” Another: “I don’t think I want to stay with the professors even if the opportunity presents itself. I want to get down there with the real folks in the grubbiness — mix in as I become one of the great unwashed” (50).
Change. Progress. Head hunters.
I wondered how Filipinos saw their nation in 1961. Saw it, at least, through the lens of literature. I opened the anthology.
She was as tall as Renato. She had proud breasts and rounded hips that promised passion and many sons. (A.R. Baban, “A Bride Across the River”)
Andres Claudio is coming home, she repeated, smacking her lips a little, her wide, plain face looking almost beautiful in the morning sunlight of Maytime. (Albina Manalo-Dans, “The End of One Maytime”)
Then there was only the call of a bird in the heavy silence of the mountain. (Jose V. Ayala, “The Mountain”)
No head hunters. So far.
Of course, the early vision for the Peace Corps was partly political. A month after issuing Executive Order 10924, and only three months into his presidency, Kennedy gave the go-ahead for a covert invasion of the Bay of Pigs. Kennedy’s worldview, and part of his aim for the Peace Corps, was influenced by intellectuals Max Milikan and Walt Rostow who believed that the battle against the Soviets should not be waged solely with ICBM stockpiles and embargos; it needed to include humanitarian foreign aid and development to commie-vulnerable nations (9), and Peace Corps was one way to do that.
You can hear this in a Kennedy speech on the Corps: “Our young men and women, dedicated to freedom, are fully capable of overcoming the efforts of Mr. Khrushchev’s missionaries who are dedicated to undermining that freedom” (12; May, Passing the Torch, 286).
Missionaries. Filipinos had seen their share of those.
During my research. I even found a mimeographed 1963 training manual. It included a section devoted to educating volunteers about the communist agenda.
Given the zeitgeist, the anti-communist inflection is understandable. But in Sargent Shriver’s hands, politics took a back seat to humanitarianism. And that pioneering American spirit. Which is a good spirit as spirits go, but it is also a myth.
I heard from behind me the rumble of wheels coming through the bookstacks. Imagining some college work study student pushing a cart of books, I moved my backpack out of the way. As the wheels passed I looked up and saw that it was in fact the library janitor, a middle-aged, tatted-up Hispanic man with a Stalin moustache. He pushed his maintenance cart past. He tapped on the women’s bathroom. “Scuse me?” he said. “Maint’nance.”
He slung them quite deftly across his thin narrow frame to the truck, his long neck swinging back and forth from stair to truck like a goose whose head is copped by a dark helmet of hair. (Benito Lim, “The White Mulberry”)
I looked down at the Peace Corp book. Fritz Fischer was on about Sargent Shriver assembling the team that would make up the first the Peace Corps administration. He said that Shriver, in choosing handsome Hollywoodite Frank Mankiewicz, “understood that the media would find it irresistable that a member of a famous film family was leading a group of ‘blond, beautiful, and brilliant Kennedy clones through the world’s mountains and jungles.’” (Redmond, Come as you are”, 286; Fischer, 25).
The janitor was in the women’s bathroom. I thought of myself, sitting in the Elmer Bobst Memorial Library, reading books about the Philippines, and I remembered how Lindsay, my Peace Corps interviewer, had given me the spiel about how just as Americans may have stereotypes about developing countries, the inhabitants of those countries have stereotypes about Americans.
I contemplated my blond hair, my Caucasian-ness, and realizing I was very much the type Shriver probably envisioned tromping through the world’s mountains and jungles, I felt both relief and disgust.


Comments are closed or deactivated
Dear Mark, It is 2010. The 60s are gone forever. The Peace Corps described in the books you cite never existed, in my humble opinion. If you are serious about working in today’s Peace Corps. May I make the following suggestions:
Go to the Internet and google: Peace Corps Journals, and then search the entries from the Phillippines. This is a great way to learn about your future coherts actually working in today’s world.
An excellent book from the administration’s (read white man, white voice, non-RPCV) perspective is: The Peace Corps Experience by P. David Searles who was the Peace Corps Director in the Phillipines in the early 70s during the Nixon administration.
My favorite Peace Corps book is “Green Fires” by Marnie Mueller. It is fiction but, like most good fiction, is full of truth. Mueller served in your early Peace Corps in Ecuador.
The absolute classic book is “Cultural Frontiers of the Peace Corps” edited by Robert B. Textor and published in 1966.
Now, I apologize if I am being patronizing and you may indeed have devoured all the online Peace Corps blogs and websites. Peace Corps wraps the decision to serve in romantic ritual and riddle. Why else would anyone decide to accept a non-paying postion for two years in an unknown environment, where you agree to serve at the “pleasure of the President” and have, for all practically purposes, little due process rights? And, you may well begin serving at the “Pleasure of Obama” and wind up at the “Pleasure of Palin.”
I wish you well.
Your search is admirable but it doe not have to be “haphazard.” Even back in 1975 when I joined, there were United Nations reports. I went to the library and read one printed that same year. Today, with a computer, you can access all kinds of stuff. I highly recommend the County Manual Series of books printed by the Sate Department. They are routinely updated. Use a search engine and type in “state department phillippines.” I also recommend United Nations reports. Do not bother with mass media news stories- they’re always a crock.
Joey
Thanks for the mention and plug for my book, even if it does include labeling me as ‘white,’ male’ and a ‘NRPCV.’ Whoops! Come to think of it, I am all three.
Note to Mark: I think PC/P has a copy of it, or at least the fellow doing the 50th anniversary book has it.
Thanks for your feedback on this post! I’ve annotated the article to note that the portrait of the early PC portrayed in the book was not necessarily volunteers’ experience.
Joey, could you elaborate on what you feel was inaccurate in the books?
Best,
Mark Fullmer
Mark,
I think it goes back to what we mean we say Peace Corps. Is it the agency’ administration (DC and Incountry) or is it the serving and returned Volunteers? I believe that Peace Corps is the latter. John Coyne has done a fabulous job of documenting the early days of the agency. Redmond’’s book “Come as You Are” is all about PC/DC…the Peace Corps agency during the sixties. It does describe a “wild and crazy time,” the “Mad, Mad Men and Women.” But, Mark, these people were employees, and, many if not most, were political appointees of the agency. It was if the Kenney campaigns just continued in agency form. They were not Peace Corps Volunteers. The actual work done by Volunteers is only mentioned fleetingly. I frequently use the term in descriping any materical from PC/DC “not history but recruiting propaganda with all the anguish airbrushed out.” Peace Corps Volunteers did then and do now work in incredibly difficult environments. That is the real Peace Corps, in my opinion. You can find it described in the books I mentioned.
I understood that you wanted to be a Volunteer not an agency employee. If you want to be an employee, your best bet is to be retired military or have experience with the Obama campaign. I only visited the famed PC/DC once in 1965 and by then, the fun was over. Since then,I have visited on a few occasions, usually to follow up on a FOIA request. It is a bureaucracy, like any other. No smoking, no drinking, no fun and the lights usually go out at five.
I will share one thing I observed while I was waiting in the lobby. State Department suits came in for a conference meeting. They had their ID and their expensive briefcases, shoes, etc. The guard made them take off their shoes, etc. and go through the security gate. They kept protesting “we are the State Department.” The receptionist supported the guard and said security would be called and they would be removed from the building if they did not comply. Trust me, Mark, you had to have been in the Peace Corps to have appreciated that.
I would note that the one unit in PC/DC which reflects the real Peace Corps is ICE. Information Communication Exchange. It is the place for technical information, some of it developed by serving Volunteers. It is not open to the public except via FOIA or Freedom of Information requests. Let me emphasize, too, Mark. That working in the field as an actual Volunteers beats being an employee with PC/DC.
I hope so very much, Mark, that you continue your quest to understand the commitment you are considering. But, in my opinion, the dustry tomes of a long gone era are not going to give you the information you
need to make an informed choice. I would urge you to do as much as possible to contact and listen to Peace Corps Volunteers currently serving in the Phillippines and to contact RRPCVs about their experiences. I am now using the term RRPCVs to identify the Recently Returned Peace Corps Volunteers. Those of us (RPCVs) who served long ago are left with our memories and our reunions, which we well earned. However, I don’t know how helpful all of that would be to you, today.
Thinking comes more easily if you have something to say.
Mark, Thank you for your extreme graciousness for not pointing out that I totally missed the fact that you are now, indeed, a serving Peace Corps Volunteer and not just a potential one. Your writing of the library setting was so vivid, placed me right there and I missed the “past tense,” to say nothing of the focus of your blog.
I do apologize. I really look forward to reading more of your posts from the real Peace Corps.